The publication processing time involves many time consuming steps. The following information was extracted from the Survey sent to the engineering journal editors. Consider the table and figure:
The tables below show the range of months in the second column under each action while the first column shows the corresponding percent of editor's responses falling within that number of months.
Initial |
Initial |
Editor |
|||
Editor Review |
Peer Review |
Decision |
|||
23% |
< 1 |
17% |
< 2 |
74% |
< 1 |
43% |
1
- 3 |
43% |
2
- 4 |
11% |
1
- 3 |
29% |
3
- 5 |
26% |
4
- 6 |
3% |
3
- 5 |
3% |
5
- 7 |
6% |
6
- 8 |
9% |
5
- 7 |
3% |
NA |
3% |
>
8 |
3% |
NA |
|
|
6% |
NA |
|
|
Total Review Time |
Accepted Papers |
||
(including revisions) |
to Print |
||
14% |
<
6 |
34% |
<
6 |
43% |
6
- 12 |
49% |
6
- 12 |
34% |
12
- 18 |
9% |
12
- 18 |
3% |
18
- 24 |
3% |
18
- 24 |
6% |
NA |
6% |
NA |
Results from table indicate that the average initial editor review process takes 3 months, the first peer review process takes 4 months, subsequent revisions take 3 months, and the final editor decision takes 1 month. Assuming it takes time T1 to research, develop, and write a good paper, and T2 to prepare the necessary paper revisions, the entire paper processing time from initial development to final acceptance takes (T1 + T2 + 11) months. Assuming a reasonable estimate for T1 = 6 months and T2 = 3 months, the entire processing time for one paper is 20 months. Novice researchers need to be cognizant of this lengthy timeline, especially considering that tenure decisions usually occur at the end of year 5. A one- or two-year delay in research and authorship responsibilities can irreparably harm an academic career. The figure also stresses the importance of extracting papers from the dissertation and/or collaborating with colleagues. The quicker a good paper "hits the street, the faster it can drive home."